Basic concepts, methods of measurement
and categorisation, interpretation of findings and models
Uher, J. (2018a). Taxonomic models of individual differences: A
guide to transdisciplinary approaches. Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373 (1744).
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2017-0171
Uher, J., Tofimova, I., Sulis, W., Netter, P., Pessoa, L.,
Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K., Rusalov, V., Petersen, I. T., &
Schmidt, L. A. (2018). Diversity in action: Exchange of perspectives
and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 373 (1744).
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2017-0172
Trofimova, I., Robbins, T.W., Sulis, W., Uher, J. (2018).
Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: Biological
perspectives on millennia-long challenges. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373 (1744).
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2017-0152
Uher, J. (2018c). The Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science
Paradigm for Research on Individuals: Foundations for the Science of
Personality and Individual Differences. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K.
Shackelford (Eds).
The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences. Vol. 1.
The Science of Personality and Individual Differences. Part 1:
Theoretical Perspectives on Personality and Individual Differences
(Chapter 4, pp. 84-109). London, UK: Sage.
Uher, J. (2015a).
Conceiving "personality": Psychologists’
challenges and basic fundamentals of the Transdisciplinary
Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals.
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49,
398-458. [Download]
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-014-9283-1
Uher, J. (2015b). Developing "personality" taxonomies: Metatheoretical and methodological rationales underlying selection approaches, methods of data generation and reduction principles.
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 531-589.
[Download]
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-014-9280-4
Uher, J. (2015c). Interpreting "personality" taxonomies: Why previous models cannot capture individual-specific experiencing, behaviour,
functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead.
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49,
600-655. [Download] DOI: 10.1007/s12124-014-9281-3
Uher, J. (2014). Fundamental challenges of contemporary "personality" research. Physics of Life
Reviews, 11, 695-696. [Download] DOI:
10.1016/j.plrev.2014.10.005
Uher, J. (2013).
Personality psychology: Lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts
reveal only half of the story. Why it is time for a paradigm shift.
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 1-55.
[Download] DOI:
10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6
Methodologies for comparisons
of individuals across situations, groups and species
Uher, J. (2015e). Comparing individuals within and across situations, groups and species: Metatheoretical and methodological foundations demonstrated in primate behaviour.
In D. Emmans & A. Laihinen (Eds.). Comparative Neuropsychology and Brain Imaging (Vol. 2), Series
Neuropsychology: An Interdisciplinary Approach. (chapter 14, pp.
223-284). Berlin: Lit Verlag. [Download]
ISBN
978-3-643-90653-3 DOI:
10.13140/RG.2.1.3848.8169
Uher, J. (2011a). Individual behavioral phenotypes: An integrative
meta-theoretical framework. Why 'behavioral syndromes' are not analogues
of 'personality'. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 521–548. [Download] DOI: 10.1002/dev.20544
Uher, J. (2008a). Comparative personality research:
Methodological approaches (Target article). European Journal of
Personality, 22, 427-455. [Download]
DOI:
10.1002/per.680
Uher, J. (2008b). Three methodological core issues
of comparative personality research. European Journal of Personality,
22, 475-496. [Download] DOI:
10.1002/per.688
|